|
|
|
|
|
by jonny_eh
4567 days ago
|
|
These "hardcore" problems like AI and pathfinding are definitely tough problems. The issue is that there's an infinite supply of such problems and there's no way a 4 year degree can cover them all. In fact, even if they did, most lessons would be forgotten before they could be proven useful in the real world. Why not just learn these areas when needed? Taking an Advanced AI course in just a 2-3 month semester is how many hours? Just spend a week or two hitting the books and you'll be good to go, and you're knowledge will be bleeding edge and up to date. Plus, you'll have been paid to learn it! |
|
Most importantly, you have a much greater chance of knowing when a solution exists and where to look for it, and more importantly know when no solutions are known.
E.g., the computer scientist recognizes the travelling salesman problem even when it doesn't involves salesmen, travelling or cities. She knows that it's NP-hard so she doesn't spend a few months trying to find an efficient exact solution for her millions of nodes, but she knows where to look to find "good enough" solutions for the problems she is trying to solve.
The autodidakt might not even recognise his problem as a TSP and thus doesn't even know that her problem is hard and which books she needs to start reading.