[alexgartrell]

I enjoyed this article a lot. It's nice to see that there are others avoiding the Google koolaid.

I DO want to see local apps accessible via the browser though. That has a lot of potential to be cool.

edit: local apps as in hosted locally, whether on the same computer or on the home network somewhere. Basically, where your data is your data and no one else's :)

[jacquesm]

Why on earth would you want your applications running locally to show in the browser, that's just another layer in between slowing things down and offering no extra level of service ?

'Applications' running on your local machine that are web centric can be reached via the localhost url, everything else knows how to talk to the display engine already (and at a much higher clip than a browser would be able to offer).

[alexgartrell]

Because I want people to be used to accessing their own stuff (media in particular) via their browser for when home media servers inevitably become a big deal and people use a youtube-like (or HTML 5 Video tag)-like interface to access their stuff.

There are absolutely limitations to using the browser as an interface to apps, but you gain in that "Remote Desktop" becomes trivial to implement and that you can have one expensive server and a bunch of thin-clients all over your house.

It's just the way I think it's headed, and I think that's pretty cool.

[tlrobinson]

Ted Dziuba is known for hating on just about everything.

I think I'll avoid the Ted Dziuba koolaid.