|
|
|
|
|
by toyg
4564 days ago
|
|
I bet it's just a cost/benefit analysis. An API is a way to get more eyeballs by motivating 3rd party developers to integrate and publicise your service. HN does not need that: it has enough traffic as it is, and given the target audience, you would see an instant proliferation of half-assed apps hammering its endpoints. So it would be an additional cost for no real benefit. The current situation (PG and friends optimise a basic but very accessible website, and a handful of third parties build APIs on top) is much more manageable. |
|