[monsterix]

Wow!

This is actually very classy and reminds me of my dad's office back in the day. I remember going to his desk on Sundays and listening to dot-matrix printers nearby. Now I know those were ordinary MIS/TPS reports that we've come to hate so much. But I used to play with that line-feed paper, ripping its edges where it connected to the printer sprockets.

There was also a huge drum printer in that office, with a giant spool of paper resting on the false floor. The room was air-conditioned, shoes left outside, very cozy and well lit. Sure it looked very cool to me then. Thank you for bringing back those pleasant memories!

[fexl]

I get pangs of nostalgia watching this thing. I'm old enough to have worked with punch cards, teletypes, mag tapes, line printers, front panel switches, and such -- in the '70s anyway. (... now where the hell are my cigarettes ...)

[hawkharris]

This 60s Google app is very cool, and I can see how it might inspire nostalgia.

But whenever I think about how prevalent cigarette smoking used to be in those days, I feel sad that so many people smoked without fully understanding the health risks. Both of my grandfathers lived and worked in that era, and both died of lung cancer.

[ams6110]

The risks were pretty much fully understood in the '70s

[nationcrafting]

Indeed. My father quit smoking from one day to the next in the mid-60s, when a surgeon friend showed him photos of a smoker's lung. The info was available.

[hawkharris]

I'm glad to hear that your father successfully quit his first time. According to the American Cancer Society, he belongs to a 7-percent minority. Please see my response above for more statistics and qualitative data about what information was - and is - available.

[hawkharris]

Your responses raises two questions:

1) Understood by whom? 2) How deep was the "understanding?" In other words, what did it signify for people's health and well being?

If your argument is that medical professionals understood the health risks associated with smoking by the late '70s, I agree. But everyday people, those most affected by smoking-related illnesses, continue to underestimate the danger.

Here are three of the many studies illustrating this point: [1] http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/239800.php [2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1381045/ [3] http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/14/1/55.full.pdf

Some excerpts:

"Smokers underestimated their relative risk compared to non-smokers and, contrary to previous interview surveys, believed they have a lower risk of developing lung cancer than the average smoker."

"These findings suggest that at least heavy smokers significantly underestimate their risk of premature mortality."

So, this leads to the second question: how does smokers' understanding of risks — or lack thereof — have practical implications for their behavior?

Among current U.S. smokers, the odds of wanting to quit, trying to quit and successfully quitting are still quite poor. About 30 percent of smokers do not want to quit. Sixty percent reported that they will not try to quit this year. And only seven percent reported successfully quitting their first time.

[4] American Cancer Society: http://www.statisticbrain.com/quitting-smoking-statistics/