|
|
|
|
|
by TrainedMonkey
4572 days ago
|
|
I am sorry, but you are incorrect. This is quite relevant for at least two reasons: 1. This is marked change of course coming from white house. Previously there was a push to maintain status quo. 2. Due to Snowden we already know quite a bit about surveillance practices. Based on that report we can judge how many things NSA "abstracts" from white house and call them out on it. |
|
Is it really? The White House has already disagreed with one of the major changes proposed by this panel (which overall, I still think they are pretty limited, and don't go far enough) - separating NSA from the US Cyber Command.
I also care less about what the White House/Obama promises to change (not our first rodeo with this, is it?), and more about what Congress is going to change and what's going to make explicitly illegal.