[my3681]

We can say what we will about TED Talks, but it is a hell of a lot better for humanity than Jersey Shore or much of the useless crap on television. Like anything, given enough time, TED will have to fight off self promotion and the recycling of ideas to remain pure and relevant, but I am confident that the fight is worth fighting.

I have a friend who teaches middle school Biology, and his students (in his words) "light up" whenever they watch a great TED talk about the similarities between chickens and dinosaurs or the way a gecko can swim through the air while falling based on something way up it's evolutionary tree. I think science-driven TED talks fill a great purpose in inspiring people that may not (yet) be scientifically minded.

Perhaps it isn't as bad as Bratton believes it is, because I can still show a good TED talk to my non-techy mother or father and blow their minds. My father is a deep thinker, but just doesn't come across deep or novel ideas very often in daily life. He is a football coach, so he just doesn't get a lot of that between dealing with kid problems and trying to win. TED has been wonderful for delivering him a nice, distilled idea to think about.

If nothing else, TED gives the general populace a starting point for the state of high-level research and a chance to think about something other than their mortgage or drama on twitter. And it does so in a manner that can be highly entertaining. It is sadly surprising how many people live a whole day, a whole month or a whole year without being inspired by anything at all. Anything that can inspire the public positively should be protected, refined and celebrated.

[Crito]

> "We can say what we will about TED Talks, but it is a hell of a lot better for humanity than Jersey Shore or much of the useless crap on television."

I do not believe this is clear when you consider the phenomenon of pseudoscience being presented under the TED brand as "TEDx".

[Crito]

Thinking about this more, I think I would say that TED actually is worse than the Jersey Shore, even ignoring the TEDx angle:

Blatantly mindless entertainment like the Jersey Shore does not sell itself as mentally nutritious, and as such, it does not satiate any sort of intellectual curiosity. Watching it only burns time, which is not intrinsically problematic.

TED on the other hand sells itself as educational, or at least edutainment. It satiates intellectual curiosity without providing any real mental nutrition. It leaves you feeling as though you have just learned something, as though you have just gained some sort of profound insight, but that sensation is empty.

[MAGZine]

"It satiates intellectual curiosity without providing any real mental nutrition."

i take issue with that. You're saying that it's better to do /absolutely nothing/ with your time then stimulate intellectual thought, even if it's just surface? If you're not getting people interested in the pursuit of solving problems, then you're never going to have any problem solvers.

[memracom]

This is true, they are better than Jersey Shore.

I have noticed that the local PBS station runs a bunch of program in the evenings that are very much like TED talks. Most of them are doctors talking about health and nutrition.

If you look at TED as a new form of TV channel that runs on Internet TV (rather than broadcast TV), then it makes more sense.

[api]

"It's better than Jersey Shore..."

That's setting the bar pretty low.