Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gcb1 4571 days ago
steam for still sucks in the way requires full control of my box to games. i only run it in a vm or spare machine, limit the games i can use. if that box is any good, it will be very good for people with a minimum security concern for their main computers
1 comments
simoncion 4571 days ago
> steam for still sucks in the way requires full control of my box to games.

What? I run Steam as a non-Administrator user on Windows, and a non-root user on Linux. Would you elaborate on your objections?

link
jamesgeck0 4571 days ago
The DirectX installer (and other dependencies) that most games want to run the first time they load requires admin access. A few games want to run the installer every time the game runs if the user isn't running as an admin. You can skip dependency installation sometimes, but other times games will crash until you take care of it.
link
simoncion 4571 days ago
I was really hoping to hear from the OP, but I'll address this tangent.

These installers would be an issue whether or not one was running Steam. If you were installing from a disc (heh) rather than using Steam, all that installation stuff would have happened while you were running the installer on the disc (with Admin privs).

So yes, installers that potentially install stuff under %PROGRAMFILES% and %SYSTEMROOT% will require admin privs. Unless you change permissions on the associated directories and registry trees, there's no way around that.

AFAICT, Steam itself (and, indeed, many games sold through Steam) does not require admin privs. Maybe I'm wrong about this. That's why I asked the OP for clarification.

link