|
|
|
|
|
by michaelochurch
4568 days ago
|
|
Not from the Bay Area. I would much rather a startup do an announced layoff than the more common thing, which is to write phony PIPs and make it look like performance-based firings. A layoff, even when it's the right thing, is an admission of a business problem and a signal that the company won't be hiring for a while. But evil startups use "silent layoffs" to save their image ("we've never had a layoff") at the expense of those let go. I do wonder what kind of backstory there was if they were afraid of people trashing the office. Usually people are pretty civilized when they are laid off-- especially if there's a severance, which would be jeopardized by bad behavior (if you vandalize the office, you get zero because the "severance" is charges not being pressed). Being laid off sucks, but it's not worth retaliating. Constant re-orgs in small companies, for what it's worth, don't seem to be a new thing either. |
|
Get a pack of such people with "little to lose" and otherwise reasonable people may be unreasonable in these circumstances.