[coldtea]

>Their opposition has merit; it's easy to point to Fukushima and Chernobyl as major disasters.

The disasters are one thing.

The constant lying from authorities, government and assigned experts was another. They were caught pants down telling lies and misinforming in handling the Fukusima accident.

This breaks trust. And for projects like that, that involve billions of dollars (enough to fuel much payola and greed), it's easy not to have much trust in the good intentions of those building and managing them in the first place.

[judk]

Even our own revered patio11 got caught as a patsy, repeating propaganda about how perfectly organized and careful the Japanese nuclear industry was.

Anyway, overall, whether the dangers are technical or social, they are still dangers.

[sillysaurus2]

Sources, please? I don't disbelieve you; I want to know more. (And precisely what you're referring to.)

[ChuckMcM]

There are several statements that TEPCO made before, during, and after the Fukishima incident that were directly refuted by the IAEA report on the disaster. And I certainly agree that it doesn't help the cause of Nuclear Power use when such things occur. There were also false and misleading statements made by the opponents of Fukishima but I hold them to a lower standard than I do TEPCO.

"Ideally, in a crisis, a government would communicate effectively to its people and the global community. Risks associated with the crisis and ongoing efforts to manage the crisis would be clearly articulated. Efforts would be made to provide factual reassurances to the international community. All of this would be done with timely information provided by recognized authorities in a coordinated fashion. Fundamental to such effective crisis communication would be adherence to a sound, well-researched accident management plan predicated on coordination and support among government entities and the utility (or utilities) involved and on trust among all parties, including the national and global communities.

None of the above happened with the Fukushima Daiichi accident. The reasons why are not entirely clear. Obviously, the Japanese government; safety authorities; and TEPCO, the nuclear utility, had a stake in the conduct and outcome of the accident, and they, for their own benefit at least, needed to provide reliable, timely information to their stakeholders and constituents. In addition, many other organizations across the globe had a stake in the conduct and outcome of the accident, and they too needed solid information to be provided to them so that they themselves could provide meaningful information to their decision makers, stakeholders, and constituents. What was actually executed was unfortunate for all parties involved."

From -- http://fukushima.ans.org/report/societal-context

[y4mi]

this is very well covered. its trivial to search for sources yourself.

as for the lying part: check the timeline

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Fukushima_I_nu...

[ewoodrich]

That's over 28 pages. And I haven't found an obvious example in the few pages I've read so far.

Which portions of the article are you referring to?

[nl]

Yeah, that's pretty useless. This is better:

On August 29, 2002, the government of Japan revealed that TEPCO was guilty of false reporting in routine governmental inspection of its nuclear plants and systematic concealment of plant safety incidents.[1]

(Note that date - 2002!)

As for Fukushima, here's a few links about false statements from TEPCO this year alone:

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ201302...

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/07/22/national/tepco-n...

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/07/31/editorials/ye...

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/08/27/national/tepcos-...

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Electric_Power_Company#Sa...