[pan69]

> What may be needed isn't laws and regulations, but a common understanding of what is and isn't acceptable for drones.

Sure. People don't even seem to understand the rules of road and keep killing each other and themselves, and you're pushing for "common understanding of what is and isn't acceptable".

Most people who walk this earth are not as clever as you might think. Just because you're intelligent, doesn't mean that everyone else is.

It seems that the human race needs very strict boundaries and limitations. But then again, in the US it's normal to have a gun and look at how "common understanding of what is and isn't acceptable" is working with that.

It's obviously only a matter of time before some dipshit is going to fly a bomb into some embassy. I understand that this will be the "outlaw" doing this but nevertheless, if you're not able to prevent it, by outlawing it you have at least the option to prosecute when abuse takes place.

(shit, reading this back I sound like some right wing fanatic. I can assure you I'm not :).

[ISL]

Fortunately, bombing an embassy is already against the law. No shortage of ways to prosecute.