1. Failing the previous, raise the perceived deficiency with a specific and workable proposed solution.
2. Failing the previous, indicate what's undesirable and how, and what behavior would be desirable.
3. Failing the previous, put a monetary bounty on the feature, fork the project or live with it. Rewriting from scratch has a 99.99% probability of being several times more work than it seems.
While I don't agree with the author's views, I have to say that he did offer the alternative solution of lxc or vagrant to more fully isolate his python environments.
Generic algorithm of making things better:
0. Give it a go to fix it oneself first. Really.
1. Failing the previous, raise the perceived deficiency with a specific and workable proposed solution.
2. Failing the previous, indicate what's undesirable and how, and what behavior would be desirable.
3. Failing the previous, put a monetary bounty on the feature, fork the project or live with it. Rewriting from scratch has a 99.99% probability of being several times more work than it seems.