|
|
|
|
|
by rosser
4577 days ago
|
|
Seems like that would give you a very high cover:hidden text ratio. It would, but that doesn't change the principles used to detect the steganographically encoded cyphertext. The bits would still be twiddled in the same way, and could be found in the same way. |
|
You could flip a single, random, least-significant bit on each frame of a 1 hour movie. This would allow you to store a 10.5KB encrypted message within. I'd like to know how anyone could possibly find those bits, let alone decipher them.