[AGuyNamedChris]

>Further, had he been less than honest, he may have been able to leverage the code itself to find more than one $500 bug.

I'm not sure I agree with this particular argument, it essentially reduces the concept of a bug bounty to blackmail. This mindset is not a constructive one.

The tester should get rewarded for their hard work and helpfulness, not the decision to follow the law.

[Ensorceled]

I think he meant scan the source code for security issues and then report those bugs one by one ...

[sophacles]

That is what I meant, I should have been more clear.

[octatone2]

It was perfectly clear, I don't know what the parent is on about with blackmail.

[Ensorceled]

I thought it was pretty clear :-)

[Dylan16807]

How is that dishonest? It sounds like a great way to improve security and get bounties.

[antoinec]

I'm sure (paying) customers will be totally fine with Prezi's source code being available to anyone that want to try to hack the site.

[Dylan16807]

I fail to see how that has anything to do with honesty. The source was leaked accidentally.