|
|
|
|
|
by trailfox
4576 days ago
|
|
I would argue the exact opposite. Odersky has gone to great lengths to discourage overly defensive commentary and bashing of other languages: http://www.scala-lang.org/old/node/12498 I don't think it's unreasonable to respond to a very poor quality blog post bashing Scala since it received very widespread publicity. The interesting story behind the story is the extreme enthusiasm with which Scala bashing posts are upvoted on various forums. It's highly unlikely that the majority of those voting have actually used Scala. |
|
Self-important to an extreme (We are a threat to them .. mentioned dozen+ times), often describing people who don't like Scala as either lazy or defensive. The concept that someone could be very adept at Scala, and still think it isn't a good language (and set of important libraries) is simply a non-starter for them.
That type of fundamental arrogance in a community so young is bad news -- and it appears to come right from the top.
On the upside, there was at least begrudging acknowledgement that issues actually exist.