|
|
|
|
|
|
by bjorg
4581 days ago
|
|
|
Is it just me or does nobody care about the performance times being so low to begin with? Wouldn't it be better if the algorithm ran for 10+ seconds at least? Maybe closer to a minute. That would reduce variance due to operating system interference, as well as hide the process startup cost, which shouldn't be relevant here. |
|
|