|
|
|
|
|
by chongli
4582 days ago
|
|
Clojure is a more opinionated language. It has a BDFL who has really stamped his mark on it. This is very much reflected in the standard library and the built-in syntax for the standard collections. Sure, nothing is stopping Racket from doing everything Clojure does, however defaults do matter. Once a language reaches critical mass, it becomes very difficult to change without breaking everything. |
|
Racket has one of the most thoughtful, opininonated, and caring core dev groups of any language, bar none. Any implication otherwise comes from ignorance. :)