|
|
|
|
|
by tghw
4586 days ago
|
|
They could be built as a part of the light, since we're changing all of that out anyway. Really not that hard. Also, contractors shouldn't be studying compliance for new things. And you would pay them as you're installing the new lights. So not out of the "goodness of their heart" either. In fact, I have no idea what you're trying to get at here. |
|
Specifications compliance is solely the responsibility of the contractor (who generally passes it on to the manufacturer).
In order to install your lighting the contractor would have to prove specification compliance, include the additional cost of the lights, and still win the low-bid process that almost all state and federal transportation projects are subject to. Alternatively, the contractor could win the project without the new lights and then come back with a value-added change order and these are not uncommon in my experience.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it's a good idea, it just isn't feasible in the field in my opinion.