Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by girvo 4590 days ago
Love the judge's comment here:

  > "There is no inventive idea here," she wrote in her order. 
  > "Having two or more parties input preference data is not inventive. 
  > Matchmakers have been doing this for millennia... It is merely a 
  > mathematical manifestation of the underlying process behind matchmaking: 
  > determining good matches."
A judge that uses the "computer algorithms == maths", and uses it to shut down a shitty patent? Awesome! I wish there were more judges like Judge Denise Colt. Well done.
2 comments

If only USPTO would include such logic in their patent reviews before passing those patents.

A good portion of such patents could've been banned with the new bill against patent trolls, if only companies like Microsoft and IBM wouldn't have lobbied so hard against such reform.

Judge Denise Cote* (not Cole)
I actually had Colt, not Cole ;) Cheers! I knew I was going to misspell it for some reason...