|
|
|
|
|
by nailk
4591 days ago
|
|
They have proven that SQL-based storage is faster than NOSQL databases. The poster of the top comment doesn't understand what this topic is about. This is actually a benchmark of InnoDB table access. You can query it using usual SQL-commands. But if you want faster access, you can use memcache API. "Read-only" is also misleading here. This is just a benchmark of get command. |
|
Too broad of a statement. 'NoSQL' is an umbrella term, and thus likely has several contenders for a raw QPS metric.
The additional step of parsing the query is obviated by statement caching. You're right though, it's simply a benchmark of how fast the query path is to the InnoDB buffer pool. The work is to optimize internal contention.
Very impressive results though.