|
|
|
|
|
by jahaja
4591 days ago
|
|
Of course. I agree with you, hence the "Today" in the last sentence. Tomorrow it might be other kinds of states or similar entities. The first sentence was however badly formulated. So it's true that a stateless society would need to defend against groups of thugs or similar just as we do today. This would probably be done in a decentralized manner rather than a paid centralized institution like today. The idea is to build a society that people would want to defend. So hopefully people would organise against thugs that claim private property rights, or also risk being exposed to them themselves. |
|