|
|
|
|
|
by warfangle
4590 days ago
|
|
> As a result we see 50% more frameworks used in JavaScript than in Ruby and Java in the top 100, echoing that fact it’s still early days for the language. I think this shows more how flexible Javascript is than that it's still early days (the language is 16 years old, only two years younger than Java). Many different frameworks have very different opinions; some are opinionated and some aren't; many of the libraries available to JS through, e.g., npm and bower are tiny little tools. That's the huge difference between a typical Javascript library and a typical Java library: many of the non-framework libraries included by Javascript projects are extremely small, modular, single-concern interfaces. So of course you'll see what seems like fragmenting. But it's not, really. |
|