|
|
|
|
|
by rbanffy
4595 days ago
|
|
Be fair. It can be said they compete, but, due to their very different design priorities, they don't compete directly. I don't think the benchmarks make much sense in this situation, unless you measure server utilization and performance guarantees (which is the dimension in which they differentiate themselves). |
|
One could use LXC for completely allocating a CPU for some container so they can compete on one aspect. LXC still doesn't run on bare-metal and so can't take on the cpu separation for hardware accesses but there is a dimension in which they compete.