|
|
|
|
|
by noptic
4588 days ago
|
|
Sorry but sounds awfully arrogant. Lowest common intelligence? Sounds like anyone unfamillar with perl is stupid. Perl is very different from other languages an has a very special syntax. The only way to REALLY understand perl is reading and writting lots of perl code from different authors. In perl nearly every problem can be solved in many different ways. If you are used to one style of perl you might still have trouble understanding the code someone else wrote. |
|
No, someone who uses things they don't understand without looking at the documentation is stupid. One could similarly make such comments about the user interfaces of vi or emacs, and get the justified response to RTFM. Only in programming languages is RTFM apparently not expected.
> The only way to REALLY understand perl is reading and writting lots of perl code from different authors.
No, the way to understand Perl is to read the documentation. There is nothing special to Perl about this and the same applies to any language. Just look for example at how many blog posts are written to explain with() and decorators in Python.
> In perl nearly every problem can be solved in many different ways.
The same is true for any language.
> If you are used to one style of perl you might still have trouble understanding the code someone else wrote.
Only if you don't read the documentation.