|
|
|
|
|
by tokenizer
4590 days ago
|
|
The only problem I have with an analyzed/conditional tax system is the legitimacy of the party in charge of collecting it. Everyone can nod their heads at taxing vehicles more than bicycles, but if that additional government income goes into tax breaks for certain corporations, or bad social policies (everyone thinks there's one!). This is why I enjoy flat taxes, so we can focus more on the policies that money provides, rather than siderail that discussion with debates on what those taxes should be. Obviously we should implement policies that become less expensive with time, but hearing that the Netherlands has a 21% tax rate on moped repair is insane. What does that money directly contribute to? The military? Tax breaks? With flat sales taxes we can focus directly on policy. Everyone is equal in terms of the percentage of product consumers must pay in taxes, for their product. |
|
That's only true in an absolute sense, but not in a relative sense. For a person making minimum wage, each dollar is worth significantly more to that person than someone making 6 figures a year. Moreover, they must ultimately spend more of their income on purchases subject to a sales tax. Thus, the person making minimum wage ends up paying a larger portion of their wealth in taxes, even though it is the person making 6 figures a year (or more) who actually derives greater value (relative and absolute) from the government services funded by those taxes.
A flat tax may be conceptually easy to understand, but it is not economically or morally equitable.