|
|
|
|
|
|
by jasonlotito
4599 days ago
|
|
|
> I would never pass the bar at a startup that's looking for the typical startup stereotype developer. I'm not seeing a problem with this. Not because you are a bad developer, but that you don't match the type of person they want to hire at that time. > I'm 100% certain that I make more business sense to hire than all of your average workoholic startup developer, but I would never be considered. What's your experience as a "startup developer" that you feel justified in making that claim? > In short there is soooo much that you need to consider when hiring. Of course. But I don't see Github being the only thing to consider, nor do I see it as being something that should be ignored. It's a piece of the puzzle. You're a programmer. A good one at that. But have you ever stopped to consider they need someone more than that for where they are at? Someone who can be more than a programmer? |
|
|
A lot of my peers work in startups and small companies. Most of them cannot make a schedule that they can meet. Many of them use the waterfall method. Most of them love to use this New Tech, because it's cool (NoSQL dbs in particular). Most of them work so much that they're less productive than I am with 40 hours a week.
I have been the sole developer for a complete rewrite of a program that gross for over a million a year, and I'm certain, absolutely certain, that most developers, and especially those who moan at "boring" work and like to use New Tech, would never have shipped anything remotely sellable.
> have you ever stopped to consider they need someone more than that for where they are at? Someone who can be more than a programmer?
The only thing I do not have, that a startup needs, is the ability to do PR. For the actual conceiving a product and evolve it, I'm just guy.