|
|
|
|
|
|
by mlyang
4593 days ago
|
|
|
Research institutions like the MIT Povery Action Lab try to make economics research as experimentally rigorous as other research -- but I think even this fails to make economics a true science. Economics is concerned principally with correlations that have no reason to be universally and timelessly true-- just a snapshot of current (and transient) social phenomenon and the corresponding correlations within that snapshot. Correlations (and policy efficacies) that are found fundamentally rest on shifting psychological, social, cultural, and political trends. Physics, on the other hand, even in correlative experiments aims to find relationships that are timelessly and fundamentally true-- and provide the foundation for other scientists to discover what those fundamental truths are that drive this correlation. Such truths don't exist in economics. |
|
|
A lot of psychology, for example, rests on experiments run on 19-year old college sophomores in Western countries. Are these actually universal human traits, or do they change depending on cultural trends?