|
|
|
|
|
|
by BUGHUNTER
4597 days ago
|
|
|
The first problem in this field is to find information sources that are not involved in GMO biz - this is especially true for scientists. It is a repeating marketing pattern to claim "scientists" are "pro gmo" - but many scientists are not pro gmo, nor "anti" gmo, they just do some research in this field and some of them come to results that are not validating monsanto or gmo industry claims. see e.g. http://www.gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2013/15156-ove... It is not easy nowadays to do independent research, as the gmo companies are controlling the knowledge market heavily and there is a very high chance that you will be attacked and even lose your fundings or your job if your research might be interpreted as beeing "anti-gmo", no matter what your personal intentions about gmo are - this happened several times. The "gmos are bad / good" discussion, however, becomes irrelevant looking at the business model of gmo companies - it is much easier to judge from that point of view. |
|
|
Source? I'm not saying you're lying, but this statement seems made up.