|
|
|
|
|
by makomk
4613 days ago
|
|
You're assuming that all that matters is the amount someone earns. If people care about more than just their on-paper income, then they can think: 1: it won't change my income now, but will save me from having to jump through ridiculous, demeaning and counter-productive requirements added to the current welfare program in an attempt to punish "undeserving" receipients. 2: it won't change my income now, but will provide a nice safety net in case I become unemployed for any reason. |
|
A bit more about myself : I'm self employed in France, and I earn less than the minimal wage (because I pay 46+% in taxes). But I'm not entitled to any unemployment benefit if I stop working. I would greatly benefit from a 1000€/m Basic Income, but I KNOW it's unfair because someone else will have to pay for it. I KNOW I have to work to earn a living.
We (almost) have Basic Income in France, it's called RSA (450€/m). That's why I'm paying 46+% taxes. That's social taxes, not income taxes (almost 50% of the population in France don't pay income taxes).