|
|
|
|
|
by dec0dedab0de
4613 days ago
|
|
If we want proper peer-to-peer communications to be possible, we need to avoid, where possible, the need for a routable middle-man to help out. That is the very reason many people are nervous about the switch. Right now NAT/PAT give home users reasonable security without the need for a firewall. The obvious solution is just to make cheap firewalls that can route properly, and default to blocking all incoming traffic. However, that brings up the same concern of needing some way to dynamically poke a hole through the firewall. Which brings us to UPnP, and I for one do not trust that at all, but maybe thats my tinfoil hat. I totally agree that we need to move forward with IPv6 though. |
|