Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jff 4614 days ago
For example, if you would like your system to be mostly stable and unchanging, like Debian or a Red Hat Enterprise Linux clone, but would like access to cutting-edge packages from Arch, Bedrock Linux can provide this simultaneously and transparently.

Does... not... compute. If you want your system to be stable and unchanging, why would you care about the most cutting-edge packages? Those are the buggy ones, the reason Arch was always breaking my libraries or fucking up GRUB. Debian stable is stable because the packages in it have been tested as they made their way through "unstable" and "testing". If you want cutting-edge Debian packages, you run "testing"--that's basically the Arch experience, down to the periodic fuckups.
1 comments
nknighthb 4614 days ago
It would compute If you explored a little further than the front page, or even carefully considered the meaning of "bedrock".

http://bedrocklinux.org/introduction.html#what_bedrock_does

link
jff 4614 days ago
"And you thought getting support for your distro was hard now, we've provided n! combinations of software for you"
link
telephonetemp 4613 days ago
That should be n^m where n is the number of packages and m is the number of distributions (for software that's common to all distributions).

And anyhow, perhaps it would easier get support this way since you could get each software package to run in the distro where it's the easiest and then set them up to interact over IP like they would in containers.

link