|
|
|
|
|
|
by hannibal5
4606 days ago
|
|
|
Apple has more subtle canary. Yours is totally obvious. The court will consider intention. If it can be shown that the wording was intentionally selected to work as warrant canary and has no other function, the case is clear. Your canary has clearly only one purpose: revealing the warrant while thinking you are smartass and get away with it. |
|
|