[neilmiddleton]

Just goes to show how much code quality contributes to a successful product.

[X4]

Fully agree with you on that. Perfectionism or shooting the bird with one bullet only is not what made Facebook a billion dollar company.

a) Serve b) Improve quality c) goto a)

[matthewmacleod]

No it doesn't - it only demonstrates that products can succeed despite poor code quality.

[ninkendo]

I think that's what he meant... it shows how much code quality contributes to success: not much at all.

[matthewmacleod]

And that's exactly what I didn't mean. It's a sample of one, and offers no information whatsoever about how much code quality can contribute to success, except that rubbish code doesn't totally preclude the hope that a product might be successful.

Let's say things had turned out a little differently, and someone had used one of those SQL injections to irreversibly erase all of early Facebook's data. We'd probably never have heard of it again.

Code quality is a good thing - like scalability, and security. Ultimately, you might succeed without it. But it'll probably be easier if you do.