Telling our users the tools we use doesn't provide any benefit to them. That being said, we are huge fans of ST2, and this seemed like a better alternative to screaming about it from the rooftops :)
Combing over the content on your website, I noticed this as well. I find it to be quite charming and most people won’t read the footer text anyway. I’d say: leave it in.
I design (dead tree) books for a living. In the colophon, I always include information about the typefaces I’ve used (font families for print are usually quite costly — $1-3k — so I mention it to gloat about my purchase as well as wanting to give credit where it’s due), the paper it’s printed on (usually FSC certified), and the eco-inks (if used.) I also mention in which country the book is printed.
I don't mention it’s laid out in InDesign on a Mac and that the copy is styled in InCopy — that’s standard. For programming, there are more options. I use BBEdit and Coda, but I respect your choice and I appreciate you letting us know what you use.
I design (dead tree) books for a living. In the colophon, I always include information about the typefaces I’ve used (font families for print are usually quite costly — $1-3k — so I mention it to gloat about my purchase as well as wanting to give credit where it’s due), the paper it’s printed on (usually FSC certified), and the eco-inks (if used.) I also mention in which country the book is printed.
I don't mention it’s laid out in InDesign on a Mac and that the copy is styled in InCopy — that’s standard. For programming, there are more options. I use BBEdit and Coda, but I respect your choice and I appreciate you letting us know what you use.