|
|
|
|
|
|
by dc_ploy
4611 days ago
|
|
|
The thing with literal data, is that you don't get a comprehensive look on their "best" work. For example, Tom Hanks. As a cinema buff, an actor's work isn't rated based on his highest and lowest rating. http://i.imgur.com/MnVFiWF.png?1 I wouldn't show the highest and lowest rated film, but rank on awards and successful ($) hits. Also, showing an "average" is good, but can really hinder a true value. |
|
|
