Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by deletes 4616 days ago
It would take about 15.6 years [0] to reach the star on a ship capable of a constant 1G acceleration.

Here is the explanation and equations: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.h...

[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6637131

3 comments

15.6 years for the passenger, thousands of years from our perspective.
So after a few subjective years, you will be overtaken by newer and faster ships, and when you arrive, there will be a flourishing civilization already there to greet you.
And the people in the faster ships will be your grandchildren, yup. Plot of Heinlein's "Time for the Stars", pretty much.
I read this when I was younger and had no idea what it was called until now. I've tried to remember it a bunch. Thanks!
I was thinking of "Far Centaurus" by A. E. van Vogt, but I'll look up the Heinlein as well now.
Meh. People were willing to go half-way across the world to try living somewhere new, probably never to return. Announce the trip, and you'll have to weed out volunteers pretty viciously.
Does this take the needed deceleration in account? If we are to land there anyway :P
Yes, but the real problem is fuel( even with antimatter ). And radiation.
I agree that the real problem is fuel, but 10 years isn't quite long enough if you are going to accelerate halfway and decelerate halfway to arrive at low speed. For a 2,500 light year trip composed of two 1,250 light year legs, the time experienced by the ship will be (in units where c and a are both approximately 1):

2 * T(1250 lyr) = 2 * (c/a) arccosh (ad/c^2 + 1) = 2 * arccosh(1250 + 1) = 2 * 7.8 = 15.6 yr.

It is dubious we will ever travel faster than 10% the speed of light.

But a probe might be able to.

Not dubious - speculative:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4534359

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6238297

Although, I certainly wouldn't bet against it long term.

If you did, you'd really be betting on your ability to collect / pay up the debt.