|
|
|
|
|
by chimeracoder
4619 days ago
|
|
> Before responding, you might want to read http://www.gwern.net/Nicotine. I can assure that this is a topic on which I have done far more research in my lifetime than that blog post. I'm not trying to be snarky; I'm just emphasizing that I have a lot more knowledge on this topic than I can reasonably compress into a 124-word HN post (like my original comment). > Citation needed. The post that you yourself link is a citation for my statement. Notice that I worded my post carefully - I did not say that nicotine has only harmful effects, or even that it has no positive effects. All I stated is that it is a toxic substance in the medical sense - a statement which could also apply to the drugs used in chemotherapy. Therefore, it is correct to say "we can be fairly certain that they are least somewhat harmful." I make no claim about the situations under which any alleged benefits outweigh the the toxic effects, simply that said toxic effects exist. |
|
Then I would appreciate your links to the studies of the harmful effects of nicotine alone that I have somehow failed to find.
> I make no claim about the situations under which any alleged benefits outweigh the the toxic effects, simply that said toxic effects exist.
So your confident assertions are merely technically correct, since everything has toxic effects under some situations such as high enough doses. But that's OK, since technically correct is the best kind of correct, as any geek knows!