|
|
|
|
|
|
by alex_young
4619 days ago
|
|
|
What worries me here is not trusting a third party with mail - we all already do that, this is the nature of SMTP. The issue is that LinkedIn wants to provide mail services without saying it's your mail provider. If you want to be a mail host, be a mail host. Don't half ass it by pretending you're offering a value added service to someone else's MX. Convince me there's a reason to use your mail service. Show me there's a reason to trust you. I evaluate it and decide if I want to switch. This process works. It's proven. We expect things out of MXs. No one knows how to evaluate an MX proxy on a consumer basis. There's no reason to change this. I don't care if you're LinkedIn or anyone else. This smacks of shortcut taking. Don't trust them. |
|
|