|
|
|
|
|
|
by potatolicious
4621 days ago
|
|
|
Like said, the word "exchange" is critical here, and isn't pedantic - this is a key part of the modern western understanding of contract law. A contract must be quid pro quo to be valid. "Bob, I'm going to come fix your fence this weekend" is a promise, but it isn't a legal contract. "Bob, I'm going to come fix your fence this weekend for $100" is a promise, and because there is a quid pro quo exchange it can qualify as an enforceable contract. Bob can potentially come after you for damages if you renege on your end of it. One-sided promises (like the one Google made) are generally not considered contractually obligated[1]. [1] http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/consideration-every-c... |
|
|