|
|
|
|
|
by alexdevkar
4631 days ago
|
|
This approach seems almost magical. There are a couple areas that I'd like to hear more about. - How detailed is the strategy coming down from the top? "... [W]hat you work on is up to you, within the bounds of what’s important to the company." What is the process of oversight to determine if each project is "important to the company"? Are there often conflicts in this area? - How does employee evaluation work? Does each member of a project submit evaluations for the others? |
|