[InternalRun]

Betteridge's law of headlines comes to mind.

[jimzvz]

What's the law for someone always mentioning Betteridge's law of headlines when a headline is posed as a question on Hacker News?

[quarterto]

Ahem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5742893

[frou_dh]

How about this one:

Any time a commenter cries ad hominem, there will be a sub-thread arguing about the definition of ad hominem.

[kevjiang]

I came to this comments page just to check if quarterto's law was still holding up :)

[jafaku]

"I wanna sound smart without too much effort" law of comments.

[candydance]

"Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

I had to look it up, so this might save some others the trouble.

[Kiro]

I would like to analyze the comment threads of all the submissions ending with question marks and see in how many Betteridge is referred to. I would guess it's close to 100%.

This was a particular bad reference since the title was very rhetorical and not meant to be taken literally.

[patrickg]

Yes. Thats why I rarely click on such titles.

[i386]

> Obviously, this isn't exactly the reinvention of the Web, but Famo.us has pushed JavaScript in a novel direction

At at least they admit its just hyperbole... right?

[corobo]

My instant thought too