|
|
|
|
|
|
by dj_axl
4621 days ago
|
|
|
> Most of the people who are making 100-200k would make at the very least double that if they were in the private sector. The base salary would double. However they'd be left without a pension, and other benefits though I think the pension is easily the largest monetary value. |
|
|
Let's use as an example someone with 20 years of federal service and a highest 3 years salary of $150k. The FERS benefit is roughly 1.1% * 20 * 150k = $33k/year. That's a 25-year annuity of $450k. To accumulate $450k over 20 years, that's about $12k per year, or 8% of income. People who serve longer will get a bigger pension, but the nature of the $100k+ positions in the federal government is that they require advanced degrees, extensive work experience in the private sector, etc, which limits the overall length of service.
If you're an educated professional (say an antitrust economist at the DOJ), you'll make a lot less money in federal service even accounting for benefits. On the other hand, if you're a document clerk, you'll make a lot more.