[nyan_sandwich]

>if we can't have this conversation, who can?

lesswrong.com is typically able to discuss difficult topics much more rationally than the rest of the internet.

[barry-cotter]

Please don't lower the quality of conversation further. Vladimir Nesov is already gone, we don't need more normal people.

[asdasf]

Unfortunately, a large subset of the people who wish to have the conversation, consider lesswrong.com to be sexist and that being "logical" and "rational" are part of the problem. I don't believe it is a conversation that can actually be productive, at all.

[Crake]

Logic is a PART OF THE PATRIARCHY.

/s