|
|
|
|
|
by shavenwarthog2
4630 days ago
|
|
On NPR the other day they said solidly red Kentucky is running their own site, and is doing really well. It sounded like they were more specific in what they wanted, and perhaps had reduced functionality thus complexity. Either way, kudos! I would have thought California (note: I live in CA) would have had a good healthcare site, considering all the techies, but I guess in this case that didn't work out. map of state/fed/joint-run sites:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/03/1243855/-Kentucky-s... |
|
Kentucky is as about as "red" as the current Federal government; even the DailyKos article you link to is self-refuting, first claiming it's "one of the only reliably red states" and then claiming "the biggest factor of all [in its claimed success] is Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear".
As I note elsewhere in this thread, Idaho is the only truly Red state implementing a full state exchange, although the map you cite claims it's not full. And that turns out to be in theory temporary, further reading my source (http://www.healthinsurance.org/idaho-state-health-insurance-...) it's in the process of building its own and depending on the Feds for 2014.