Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by cpuguy83 4631 days ago
It is HIS empirical evidence. It's his evidence based on his observation.
1 comments

It's a meaningless observation. One anecdote is not statistically relevant.
Self-reports typically don't even count as one data point, because they're notoriously unreliable. Reports about one's childhood and motivations, doubly so. There's a reason psychology as a science is no longer based primarily on introspection, as it was in the 19th century.

Exceptions if people's self-conceptions are what is actually being studied; in that case collecting self-reports can be legitimate data-collection.