[undershirt]

I was crossing my fingers for that too. I create JSON files a lot. It's annoying when I'm _reordering_ elements separated by newlines. It's annoying when I'm generating JSON files and I have to code in a special case to skip the comma. It breaks the consistency that I just desire as a programmer.

[Touche]

Why do you manually code json?

[undershirt]

I built a game that uses JSON for metadata and config files.

[stormbrew]

You could have used yaml.

... The irony of yaml being human and version control friendly but including massive amounts of serialization mechanism vs. json being for data exchange and having extremely rudimentary serialization features aside.

[VMG]

because that is what json is for

[optymizer]

no, that's not what json for. JSON is for exchange data between machines. We already have data interchange formats for humans, we call those 'languages'.

[mercurial]

Yes, yes. And we could also have everything as binary. Now, UNIX people decided long ago to use plain text to communicate between processes, mostly because it's infinitely easier to read - and makes it possible to edit by hand if you need to. Have to interface with a REST API which consumes JSON and you want to do some testing? Open your text editor anywhere curl is installed, and you're done. That's pretty damn convenient.

[optymizer]

We can't have everything as binary, because us humans can't even agree on which bit is most significant out of a list of 64/32/16/8 bits.

[Zikes]

Also becoming commonplace as a config file format.

[mercurial]

Yeah. On the other hand, I find YAML much better for this kind of thing. JSON is readable and writable by hand, but it's not terribly nice.

[AYBABTME]

If so, use Protobuf, BSON and jump in the wagon for SPDY.

Why JSON at all if you don't care about reading it?

I'm not against Protobuf, BSON, SPDY and the likes, my argument is just that JSON is used over binary formats only because it's readable.

[GrinningFool]

It must be nice to live in a world in which you never have to read JSON. Or, for that matter, any other format which is used to exchange data between machines - binary included. Worse, sometimes even XML.

I should like to visit that world one day.

[VMG]

json.org:

> JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is a lightweight data-interchange format. It is easy for humans to read and write.

[optymizer]

The primary purpose of JSON is to exchange data between machines. You may have missed that part.

Sure, it's easy to read and write by humans, because it's simple, but that's not what it is for (which is what I was disagreeing with). Humans communicate better using a natural language, not JSON, as evidenced by the fact that both our comments are in English, not JSON.

And 'easy' is relative anyway. Some of my users have to write JSON (they're not developers). It would be much easier for them if the UI had built the JSON for them, while they click on buttons.

[Skalman]

I frequently use it for settings.