|
|
|
|
|
|
by alpatters
4634 days ago
|
|
|
> Stack allocation is irrelevant for most of what the application is doing. Well I disagree with that. In C++ it is quite common for most objects to be allocated on the stack. I have never heard stack allocation being described as irrelevant. Of course if the language puts everything on the heap then that statement might be true. |
|
|
Most objects? You have 64GB of RAM! You want to tell me that you can take advantage of all that RAM with thread stacks? You're unlikely to even use 4GB of stack.
If you don't, then you're talking about a small application.