|
|
|
|
|
|
by SwellJoe
6214 days ago
|
|
|
Just saw this on Twitter: http://paste2.org/p/253717 According to this, it seems like HyperVM wasn't even the attack vector. It was merely the enabler of damage in an already exploited data center. Exploits are known to exist in HyperVM, but the case in question wasn't the result of it, if this post is to be believed. |
|
|