Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by GabrielF00 4635 days ago
If you owned property, would you allow huge numbers of tourists access to it if you had no staff onsite and no idea when you were going to be able to get staff? Now consider if you owned 401 pieces of property* across the country. Some of these are historic sites that are pretty delicate. Some of these consist of thousands of square miles of wilderness where people get killed even when there ARE park rangers around. These people are charged with protecting the nation's heritage. They're not just going to allow somebody to wander into the Lincoln Memorial and start chiseling their name on the walls. And of course there are liability issues.

*The National Parks Service has 401 units. The actual number of individual sites is higher.
1 comments
bmelton 4634 days ago
No, but if my complaint was that I didn't have the money to staff it with the fraction of a full time employee it takes to run and administer (periodically, I might add; There is no full time staff for any of the particular monuments in DC), I would have a hard time justifying paying for multiple guardsmen, police and park rangers to keep people out of them.

The rental of barricades I can see as sensible -- the rental of barricades as well as a 1400% increase in staff? I cannot.

link
GabrielF00 4634 days ago
I don't know what the staffing level before the shutdown was. Wikipedia says that the WWII memorial was patrolled by park police 24/7 and staffed by interpretive rangers from 9:30am to 11:30pm, which suggests that your claim that "there is no full time staff for any of the particular monuments" is false. Also, the WWII memorial has become something of a circus with media, congresscritters, etc. They need to have staffing to deal with this circus. This is one site out of hundreds. I'm sure if you go to any of the hundreds of parks that don't have cameras pointed at them you'll see a massive DECREASE in staff.
link
bmelton 4634 days ago
1) The park police are roving, and not dedicated to particular monuments or parks in the DC area. I wasn't aware of the interpretive Rangers working 2 hours a day, but regardless, they have definitely increased staff at all of the DC monuments.

In addition, they've attempted to close attractions they don't manage, like Mount Vernon, among others.

2) The WW2 memorial, and memorials in the DC area aren't the only places that security has been increased.

I'm sure you're not wrong in that over all of the 400+ locations, we have likely seen a decrease in personnel, but the executive branch is decidedly making a point of ensuring that the most pain is felt because of the shutdown.

link
GabrielF00 4634 days ago
14 hours, not 2 hours
link
bmelton 4634 days ago
Oh snap. Thanks, that was a pretty severe oversight.

Anecdotal, for sure, but as I live in the area, and visit those monuments fairly often, I find it a little interesting that I've never seen an 'interpretive ranger'.

I'll have to keep my eyes open for them if and when our government gets back up and running.

link