Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ternaryoperator 4635 days ago
>that's exactly what we should be doing with false marketing claims, or else we end up with MongoDB all over again

Sorry, but I don't get the reference to MongoDB. What happened there?

1 comments

I was suggesting that MongoDB's marketing claims initially went unchecked here and generally. It seems a lot of people assumed that others had done the due-diligence for them.

They started using it not knowing that it was not very concurrent, that the default transaction mode allowed data-loss, that it was slow when run in safe-mode, that it was not reliable unless replicated etc. (And these were all design issues, not implementation bugs). A lot of those people were pretty badly burned, particularly in the early days.

Ah, I was unaware of that bit of history.