[k3n]

> Really? Is Hacker News this gullible?

Not so gullible so as to take to heart what you're saying, considering that you created your account solely to deride her. Here we are, 70 days after your account was created, and yet you've only posted 1 comment that wasn't negatively criticizing her? And your only argument is a copy/paste of your original complaint from 70 days ago, all based off of source-control introspection?

I don't care if what you're saying is true or not, I think your behavior (an apparent personal vendetta) is the only sad thing here.

[AznHisoka]

Criticize the comment.. not the intention.

[farnsworth]

Criticizing her? Sounds like a compliment to me.

[ars_technician]

Your comment is an ad hominem. Address what he said, not his intentions or account history.

[k3n]

Please consider that the comment in question is a verbatim copy/paste from the previous time it was brought it up. If you want to consider spamming the same comment over multiple threads as valid discussion, by all means, have at it.

However, everything they brought up was already addressed 70 days ago. To be honest, petea raises a valid concern, and I certainly don't want to be party to shills or other types of fraudulent or deceptive activities, but considering that petea didn't even put forth the effort to further refine or follow-up on their original argument (especially given 70 additional data points [sites] with which to draw evidence from), then that signals to me that they have motivations beyond what meets the eye.